Mai Evolving Understanding of the Nature of Healing
Posted on Nov 24th, 2009
by
mai
No matter how broad your understanding of healing is, there is always room to delve deeper. It’s apparent that healing is viewed differently by each individual and each modality and sometimes their views are inconsistent with each other. Nevertheless, the journey of healing is central to its accomplishment. It is a test that one must push thru to reap its benefits. Healing involves a whole body connection that must be nurtured into existence not prematurely thrust upon anyone. A naturopath must find the individualized formula for healing specific to each patient in order for it to be safe and effective.
I define the Vis Medicatrx Naturea as the healing power of nature where all things have an innate point of healthy balance at which they thrive and strive to maintain. When our bodies are away from this point, they move back to this balance on their own. While we can amplify nature’s proclivity for healing, overriding it further disrupts the balance. I can’t extricate the idea of the nature of healing from the Vis. I define healing as a cyclical journey of moving towards positive self image, growth, realization, and an overriding sense of safety in the world which brings you to a state that is free of anxiety in all aspects of your life; including but not limited to social, physical, emotional, and spiritual. The journey is part of everything. Healing is a sense of safety is being free of anxiety. The healing crisis in an amazing phenomenon and journey. This is the situation where your symptoms will aggravate before they will improve. In Seven Herbs: Plants as Teachers Matthew Wood explains that the herb iris is the embodiment of the healing crisis. The healing crisis is a test. People don’t usually want or won’t abide their symptoms getting worse, but this is necessary to get the life force (wesen) back in tune with itself.
People experience healing in different ways. I generally associated “cure” with allopaths and “healing” with the mind-body-spirit connection associated with naturopaths. However, while studying Samuel Hannahman and the aphorisms in the Organon, I got the general feeling that healing was not its focus but that homeopathy focused on cure. Aphorisms 1 and 8 explain that the physician's only mission is to cure the sick so they can get on with the higher functions of their lives, not to speculate about the origin of disease, and that getting rid of symptoms eradicates the disease. This was jarring. I began to think differently about cure and the word itself. Perhaps I was wrong to attribute such a negative connotation to it.
We have to come to terms with all aspects of the naturopathic experience on our own. Several of our professors have different takes on ideology, methodology, and modalities in naturopathic medicine. They also value ideas within the realm of naturopathy to varying degrees. I got the notion that "cure" was an "allopathic thing" that didn't have enough to do with healing from my Health Psychology course. However, in my Homeopathy course I was learning something very different and something that seemed very reductionist (aphorisms previously mentioned). This realization has forced me to think that some people heal with methods or intentions we initially find to be destructive or at least inadequate. All coping mechanisms are employed because they serve a useful purpose. This is even true of pathological coping mechanisms. For me, healing and freedom from anxiety are closely linked. I tend to experience anxiety often and though it serves a useful purpose on a regular basis, it has also caused undo worry and stress effecting my life and relationships. Finding a way to get rid of negative anxiety in life would lead to increased healing for me. The difference between positive and negative anxiety and the difference between positive stressors (eustressors) and negative stressors (distressors) is useful purpose.
Healing is a transfer of energy and intention that can not be forced. Energy is transferred in tangible and intangible ways. Tangible examples include rhythm and vibrations of sound or touch. A less tangible example is how water can be used to heal inflammation (Father Kneipp) by holding a remembrance of purity and reminding our tissue cells of it. Healing involves recognizing a lesson. It is purposeful and must be the result of an expanded understanding. If we imposed healing on another we do them a disservice. In order for healing to occur, one must hold a space for healing within themselves. The better you know yourself the better primed you will be to accept healing. You can not push another into healing. You can only meet them where they are at. Failing to do so may harm the therapeutic relationship. Healing means different things to different people, but it must encompass whatever it needs in order to accomplish the healing of the individual.
It is generally held that the healing process encompasses all aspects of one’s life including spirit, emotion, society, and biology. All things are possible, and it's very possible we will encounter ones that do not see relevance for healing on one or more of these levels. Perhaps they see no need for spiritual healing or spirituality. How do you help them heal (for example) a physical ailment without that spiritual component? This is where I hope to widen my understanding of the nature of healing in the future. I am excited to find where my understanding will take me. How rigid will I hold my boundaries and what prejudices will influence them? How will others deal with my liberal views of healing when theirs are more conservative? How will this effect the therapeutic relationship? I'm currently developing these answers.
I realize that my understanding of healing is far from being as board as it eventually needs to be. Healing is different than cure but that doesn't mean cure is pejorative. It requires an exchange of energy that need not be forced. Healing is most effective if the person is not resistant to its process. There continue to be many questions to answer in regards to the nature of healing. However, every person especially every practicing naturopath must develop their own individualized ideology.
I define the Vis Medicatrx Naturea as the healing power of nature where all things have an innate point of healthy balance at which they thrive and strive to maintain. When our bodies are away from this point, they move back to this balance on their own. While we can amplify nature’s proclivity for healing, overriding it further disrupts the balance. I can’t extricate the idea of the nature of healing from the Vis. I define healing as a cyclical journey of moving towards positive self image, growth, realization, and an overriding sense of safety in the world which brings you to a state that is free of anxiety in all aspects of your life; including but not limited to social, physical, emotional, and spiritual. The journey is part of everything. Healing is a sense of safety is being free of anxiety. The healing crisis in an amazing phenomenon and journey. This is the situation where your symptoms will aggravate before they will improve. In Seven Herbs: Plants as Teachers Matthew Wood explains that the herb iris is the embodiment of the healing crisis. The healing crisis is a test. People don’t usually want or won’t abide their symptoms getting worse, but this is necessary to get the life force (wesen) back in tune with itself.
People experience healing in different ways. I generally associated “cure” with allopaths and “healing” with the mind-body-spirit connection associated with naturopaths. However, while studying Samuel Hannahman and the aphorisms in the Organon, I got the general feeling that healing was not its focus but that homeopathy focused on cure. Aphorisms 1 and 8 explain that the physician's only mission is to cure the sick so they can get on with the higher functions of their lives, not to speculate about the origin of disease, and that getting rid of symptoms eradicates the disease. This was jarring. I began to think differently about cure and the word itself. Perhaps I was wrong to attribute such a negative connotation to it.
We have to come to terms with all aspects of the naturopathic experience on our own. Several of our professors have different takes on ideology, methodology, and modalities in naturopathic medicine. They also value ideas within the realm of naturopathy to varying degrees. I got the notion that "cure" was an "allopathic thing" that didn't have enough to do with healing from my Health Psychology course. However, in my Homeopathy course I was learning something very different and something that seemed very reductionist (aphorisms previously mentioned). This realization has forced me to think that some people heal with methods or intentions we initially find to be destructive or at least inadequate. All coping mechanisms are employed because they serve a useful purpose. This is even true of pathological coping mechanisms. For me, healing and freedom from anxiety are closely linked. I tend to experience anxiety often and though it serves a useful purpose on a regular basis, it has also caused undo worry and stress effecting my life and relationships. Finding a way to get rid of negative anxiety in life would lead to increased healing for me. The difference between positive and negative anxiety and the difference between positive stressors (eustressors) and negative stressors (distressors) is useful purpose.
Healing is a transfer of energy and intention that can not be forced. Energy is transferred in tangible and intangible ways. Tangible examples include rhythm and vibrations of sound or touch. A less tangible example is how water can be used to heal inflammation (Father Kneipp) by holding a remembrance of purity and reminding our tissue cells of it. Healing involves recognizing a lesson. It is purposeful and must be the result of an expanded understanding. If we imposed healing on another we do them a disservice. In order for healing to occur, one must hold a space for healing within themselves. The better you know yourself the better primed you will be to accept healing. You can not push another into healing. You can only meet them where they are at. Failing to do so may harm the therapeutic relationship. Healing means different things to different people, but it must encompass whatever it needs in order to accomplish the healing of the individual.
It is generally held that the healing process encompasses all aspects of one’s life including spirit, emotion, society, and biology. All things are possible, and it's very possible we will encounter ones that do not see relevance for healing on one or more of these levels. Perhaps they see no need for spiritual healing or spirituality. How do you help them heal (for example) a physical ailment without that spiritual component? This is where I hope to widen my understanding of the nature of healing in the future. I am excited to find where my understanding will take me. How rigid will I hold my boundaries and what prejudices will influence them? How will others deal with my liberal views of healing when theirs are more conservative? How will this effect the therapeutic relationship? I'm currently developing these answers.
I realize that my understanding of healing is far from being as board as it eventually needs to be. Healing is different than cure but that doesn't mean cure is pejorative. It requires an exchange of energy that need not be forced. Healing is most effective if the person is not resistant to its process. There continue to be many questions to answer in regards to the nature of healing. However, every person especially every practicing naturopath must develop their own individualized ideology.

Help



